By Susan Donkin
This short takes a provocative examine latest socio-legal literature with a comparative research of terrorism keep watch over orders, concentrating on how the idea that of pre-emption suits inside of a standard criminological framework. This well timed paintings examines how such measures will be conceived and interpreted inside a situational crime prevention method. during the last decade, socio-legal students have pointed out an increase in pre-emptive keep watch over mechanisms to reply to terrorism and different threats within the post-9/11 global. Many have argued that this pre-emptive intent has been used to justify the advent of measures that go beyond proven criminal and hazard frameworks, to house contributors or teams idea to pose a possibility to the kingdom or its electorate. Preventing Terrorism and Controlling hazard: A Comparative research of regulate Orders within the united kingdom and Australia should be of curiosity to researchers in Criminology and felony Justice, relatively with a spotlight on terrorism, chance evaluation, and human rights.
Read or Download Preventing Terrorism and Controlling Risk: A Comparative Analysis of Control Orders in the UK and Australia PDF
Best comparative books
Financial Integration in East Asia (Trade and Development)
Monetary Intergration in East Asia explains the several equipment economists use to evaluate how open a country's economic system is to family and overseas impacts, and applies those checks to 10 international locations in East Asia. It explains how a rustic that has an open economic climate differs from one who is managed.
Unstable Constitutionalism: Law and Politics in South Asia
Even supposing the sphere of constitutional legislation has develop into more and more comparative lately, its geographic concentration has remained constrained. South Asia, regardless of being the location of the world's biggest democracy and a colourful if turbulent constitutionalism, is without doubt one of the vital overlooked areas in the box.
Community Care for Older People: A Comparative Perspective
This available textbook compares ways that uncomplicated elements of group care are funded, organised and supplied through governmental and non-governmental businesses, permitting practitioners and policy-makers to profit from the reviews in their opposite numbers in Europe and North the United States.
- Media, Bureaucracies, and Foreign Aid: A Comparative Analysis of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, France and Japan (Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis)
- Comparative Risk Assessment: Concepts, Problems and Applications
- Comparative Workplace Employment Relations: An Analysis of Practice in Britain and France
- The New International Telecommunication Regulations and the Internet: A Commentary and Legislative History
- The Comparative Physiology of Regulatory Peptides
Additional resources for Preventing Terrorism and Controlling Risk: A Comparative Analysis of Control Orders in the UK and Australia
Sample text
Moreover, they are provided with a summary of the grounds for issuance, and the opportunity to provide evidence in their defence, something controlees before British judges were not privy to. Because of the PTA forerunner’s association with immigration law, control order proceedings in the UK appropriated certain practices from the SIAC hearings. Closed hearings and Special Advocates were used in an effort to address some of the procedural shortcomings associated with national security concerns.
To detain or not to detain: a question of public duty? Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 16, 288–302. , & Donkin, S. (2009). Law in order: interpreting Australian anti-terrorism legislation. Paper presented at the Crossing Borders: Promoting Regional Law Enforcement Cooperation—European, Australian and Asia-Pacific Perspectives, Canberra, 8 April 2009, Canberra. Roach, K. (2002). Did September 11 change everything? Struggling to preserve Canadian values in the face of terrorism. McGill Law Journal, 47, 893–947.
It is with this distinction in mind that the rest of the Brief has been analysed and written. To summarise, the literature on control orders has focused on three key points: Firstly, control orders are hybrid measures which exist outside of the traditional legal frameworks, enabling departures from well established procedural safeguards in criminal cases. Secondly, these deviations are justified on the basis of the exceptional risk posed by terrorism and the need to protect the state and its people from a terrorist attack.