By Ralph Howard
This publication indicates that a lot of classical necessary geometry will be derived from the coarea formulation via a few straightforward suggestions. Howard generalizes a lot of classical indispensable geometry from areas of continuous sectional curvature to arbitrary Riemannian homogeneous areas. to take action, he offers a normal definition of an 'integral invariant' of a submanifold of the gap that's sufficiently common adequate to hide so much instances that come up in essential geometry.Working during this generality makes it transparent that the kind of indispensable geometric formulation that carry in an area doesn't depend upon the whole workforce of isometries, yet basically at the isotropy subgroup. As a distinct case, necessary geometric formulation that carry in Euclidean area additionally carry in the entire easily hooked up areas of continuing curvature. particular proofs of the consequences and plenty of examples are incorporated. Requiring historical past of a one-term path in Riemannian geometry, this publication can be used as a textbook in graduate classes on differential and critical geometry.
Read Online or Download The Kinematic Formula in Riemannian Homogeneous Spaces PDF
Similar geometry books
Contact Geometry and Linear Differential Equations
The purpose of the sequence is to give new and significant advancements in natural and utilized arithmetic. good validated in the neighborhood over 20 years, it deals a wide library of arithmetic together with a number of vital classics. The volumes offer thorough and particular expositions of the equipment and ideas necessary to the themes in query.
This paintings covers the lawsuits of the NSF-CBMS convention on 'Spectral difficulties in Geometry and mathematics' held on the collage of Iowa. The vital speaker was once Peter Sarnak, who has been a principal contributor to advancements during this box. the quantity ways the subject from the geometric, actual, and quantity theoretic issues of view.
- Hyperbolic geometry
- Complex Algebraic Geometry (Ias Park City Mathematics Series, V. 3) PCMS 3
- Transformation Geometry: An Introduction to Symmetry (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics)
- Geometry of Vector Sheaves: An Axiomatic Approach to Differential Geometry Volume II: Geometry. Examples and Applications (Mathematics and Its Applications) (Volume 2)
- Points and Lines: Characterizing the Classical Geometries (Universitext)
Additional resources for The Kinematic Formula in Riemannian Homogeneous Spaces
Example text
1 1 R e m a r k . '. **''(N) JG for all compact submanifolds M , N with M of type V0 and N of type W0. By then evaluating both sides of this equation for several choices of submanifolds M , N it is possible to get enough equations to solve for the c ^ ^ ' s . This last step is clearly formidable and is to be avoided if possible. 2 below can be used to evaluate JG Iv(MC\gN) Q,G(g). In practice it seems that a combination of these two methods works the best. 2 and the form of the particular polynomial V to conclude that most of the Ci^p are zero.
This implies (4-13) / fc(&a)nG(Ln)(a)= We need one extra piece of information. / IV((&M n L 0) n aN0)nG{Lo)(a) APPENDIX TO SECTION 4: CROFTON TYPE KINEMATIC FORMULAS. 33 L e m m a . 18 then there is a constant C2 such that for every compact p f q — n dimensional (p = dim(M), q = dim(jCo), n = d\m(G/K)) submanifold M0 of L0 - G(L0)/K(L0) and every continuous function f : M0 —> R the formula (4-i4) / JG(LO) / JMoCiaNo /n Mo n G(Lo) (a) = c2 / / n M o JM0 holds. e. one that, except for a set of measure zero, is constant on each of a finite number of open subsets of M 0 that have well behaved boundaries.
If in addition LQ is totally geodesic and I > 1 then Qi = 0 for 0 < i < I — 1 and so the last equation reduces to (4-11) / IV(M n9N)nG/G{Lo)(L) = IQ<(M). 15 R e m a r k That (4-10) reduces to (4-11) when Lo is totally geodesic justifies our earlier claim that as far as the type of integral geometric formulas that arise G/G(LQ) behaves very much like a Grassmann manifold. Compare with the formulas in section 8 of [6] and the linear kinematic formula in section 3 of [19]. 16 Outline of t he proof.