The Lin-Ni's problem for mean convex domains by Olivier Druet

By Olivier Druet

The authors turn out a few subtle asymptotic estimates for confident blow-up suggestions to $\Delta u+\epsilon u=n(n-2)u^{\frac{n+2}{n-2}}$ on $\Omega$, $\partial_\nu u=0$ on $\partial\Omega$, $\Omega$ being a tender bounded area of $\mathbb{R}^n$, $n\geq 3$. particularly, they express that focus can take place simply on boundary issues with nonpositive suggest curvature while $n=3$ or $n\geq 7$. As an instantaneous outcome, they end up the validity of the Lin-Ni's conjecture in size $n=3$ and $n\geq 7$ for suggest convex domain names and with bounded power. fresh examples via Wang-Wei-Yan convey that the certain at the strength is an important situation

Show description

Read or Download The Lin-Ni's problem for mean convex domains PDF

Similar geometry books

Contact Geometry and Linear Differential Equations

The purpose of the sequence is to give new and demanding advancements in natural and utilized arithmetic. good validated locally over twenty years, it bargains a wide library of arithmetic together with a number of very important classics. The volumes provide thorough and designated expositions of the tools and ideas necessary to the themes in query.

Spectral Problems in Geometry and Arithmetic: Nsf-Cbms Conference on Spectral Problems in Geometry and Arithmetic, August 18-22, 1997, University of Iowa

This paintings covers the lawsuits of the NSF-CBMS convention on 'Spectral difficulties in Geometry and mathematics' held on the collage of Iowa. The valuable speaker used to be Peter Sarnak, who has been a important contributor to advancements during this box. the quantity techniques the subject from the geometric, actual, and quantity theoretic issues of view.

Additional resources for The Lin-Ni's problem for mean convex domains

Sample text

This proves the claim. 2. 2: We assume that d(xα , ∂Ω) =ρ α→+∞ rα lim 1. CONVERGENCE AT GENERAL SCALE 49 with ρ ∈ [0, +∞). In particular, limα→+∞ xα = x0 ∈ ∂Ω. We consider the domain ˜α Ux0 , the extension g˜ of the Euclidean metric ξ, the chart ϕ and the extension u defined in Lemma 2. Let R > 0 and let α > 0 large enough such that BR (0) ⊂ rα−1 (ϕ−1 (Ux0 ) − ϕ−1 (xα )). Let us define (x1,α , xα ) := ϕ−1 (xα ) with x1,α ≤ 0 and xα ∈ Rn−1 . Therefore, as is easily checked, we have that for any x ∈ BR (0), ϕ(ϕ−1 (xα ) + rα x) ∈ Ω ⇔ x1 ≤ |x1,α | .

Then there exists v˜i ∈ C 2 (Rn \ {θ˜j , σ(θ˜j )/ j ∈ Ii }) such that 1 lim v˜i,α = v˜i in Cloc (Rn \ {θ˜j , σ(θ˜j )/ j ∈ Ii }). 35) λj |x − θ˜j |2−n + |x − σ(θ˜j )|2−n for all x ∈ Rn \{θj , σ(θ˜j )/j ∈ Ii }. 36) v˜i (x) := + ψ˜i (x) for all x ∈ B2δ (0) \ {0} with ψ˜i (0) > 0. |x|n−2 Proof of Propositions 7 and 8: We apply Proposition 6. 1: we claim that points (i) to (v) of Proposition 6 hold with μα := μi,α and rα := si,α for all α ∈ N. We prove the claim. 1 We claim that (i) holds. We prove this claim via two claims.

4) si,α = o(d(xi,α , ∂Ω)) when α → +∞. , N } such that μi,α = o(μj,α ) when α → +∞ and si,α = μi,α 2 (μ + |xi,α − xj,α |2 ) μj,α j,α 1 2 for all α ∈ N. Proof of Theorem 3: For x ∈ s−1 i,α (Ω − xi,α ), we define vi,α (x) := sn−2 i,α n−2 uα (xi,α + si,α x). 7) vi (x) = λi + ψi (x) for all x ∈ B2δ (0) \ {0} with ψi (0) > 0. |x|n−2 We prove the claim. 8) si,α for all α ∈ N. In particular, vi,α is well defined on B1/2 (0). d(xi,α ,∂Ω) si,α Assume that limα→+∞ quences of Proposition 7. 8) that ρ ≥ 1 and that si,α limα→+∞ xi,α = x0 ∈ ∂Ω.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.56 of 5 – based on 29 votes