Mode of Production and Social Formation: An Auto-Critique of by Barry Hindess, Paul Q. Hirst

By Barry Hindess, Paul Q. Hirst

Show description

Read or Download Mode of Production and Social Formation: An Auto-Critique of Pre-Capitalist Modes of Production PDF

Similar industries books

Learning on Display: Student-created Museums That Build Understanding

The tale of the civil rights move. The features of eastern paintings and tradition. the significance of innovation. The background of your group. irrespective of the topic zone or the grade point, a faculty museum undertaking can increase studying and educating. in contrast to technology gala's or artwork exhibits, which spotlight the paintings of people, university museums are collaborative, multifaceted initiatives that construct knowing.

Handbook of Concierge Medical Practice Design

In concierge drugs, physicians increase amenities-rich club courses and gather a per month or annual club price to pay for the facilities as well as the scientific companies rendered. instruction manual of Concierge clinical perform layout examines the numerous issues physicians needs to make sooner than transitioning their practices into concierge companies.

Reimagining (Bio)Medicalization, Pharmaceuticals and Genetics: Old Critiques and New Engagements

Lately medicalization, the method of constructing whatever scientific, has won substantial flooring and a place in daily discourse. during this multidisciplinary number of unique essays, the authors expertly think about how matters round medicalization have built, ways that it's altering, and the aptitude shapes it's going to absorb the long run.

Extra info for Mode of Production and Social Formation: An Auto-Critique of Pre-Capitalist Modes of Production

Sample text

Those effects are not produced by the concepts of the forms, they are represented by them. The two concepts do not designate entities 'relations' and 'forces', one of which hegemonises the other; rather they are used to generate concepts of social relations, labour process, class struggles, etc. In those concepts, relations and forces are combined. To a considerable extent this chapter does meet the conditions of the separation of the order of development of concepts in discourse from those of the order of connection of the social relations specified in terms of those concepts - although there remains a tendency to derive class 'interests' directly from the concept of the relation of agents to the labour process.

Why was a 'back door' needed at all? The answer is a simple one: the criticism of Balibar's project took a form which rendered any 'general theory' of modes of production impossible. The general theory, in which modes were formed by the differential combination of elements, appeared to make possible the generation of concepts of specific modes of production directly from the basic concepts of the theory of modes of production. Hence Alain Badiou was by no means inaccurate when he used a metaphor from mathematical formalisation, conceiving modes as 'sets' formed by the combination of the elementary categories and the general theory as the matrix 'set' of all the 'sets' possible within it.

Why was a 'back door' needed at all? The answer is a simple one: the criticism of Balibar's project took a form which rendered any 'general theory' of modes of production impossible. The general theory, in which modes were formed by the differential combination of elements, appeared to make possible the generation of concepts of specific modes of production directly from the basic concepts of the theory of modes of production. Hence Alain Badiou was by no means inaccurate when he used a metaphor from mathematical formalisation, conceiving modes as 'sets' formed by the combination of the elementary categories and the general theory as the matrix 'set' of all the 'sets' possible within it.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.07 of 5 – based on 22 votes